![]() using a hard synth is certainly a lot less effort and has fewer things that could go wrong. ![]() Thereafter, each additional synth is *way* less expensive.īut in terms of flipping the power on and starting to play. Already, that's probably less than a hard synth. If you already have the computer and that's not a part of the entry cost, then the first synth requires a MIDI keyboard controller and one piece of software. ![]() However, if a DAW is definitely part of the picture, you'll likely have fewer hassles with soft synths compared to hooking up external gear for both recording (input) and playback (output).Īnother big factor is cost. You don't need a DAW in the picture if you're comparing to a standalone synth that you use for live performance. Notice it is more slim lines and has programmable buttons. Works as a Midi Controller and goes for about 50 second hand. This is an old Casio 61 key CTK-700 Synthesizer. ![]() You're asking for an apples to oranges comparison in some ways. Here are some visuals on the difference between a controller and a synth. In the past it's always been the hard synth, but nowadays the times are moving on, do you think controllers and comps are the future of synthesis? Which do you people think is best for music production? A classic hardware synthesizer like the v-synth GT or Gaia SH-01, or a good keyboard controller coupled up with a good DAW, for example the novation remote sl49 mkii with sonar and dimension pro/rapture/z3ta+. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |